Tweet
Trenbolone is not "new" it was synthesized in the mid 1960's by Hoescht Roussel. Bodybuilders have been using it since the late 60's.
Original Trenbolone Acetate was marketed as Finaject and was 30mg/ml. It was taken off the market in 1987, Parabolan the long acting human version of Trenbolone was trashed in 1996 there are human studies done of course with Parabolan and most of the ones noted were on the psychological effects caused even by the long ester.
TA is a veterinary drug and no human studies are available.
Equipoise Boldenone Undecylate is also a vet drug but it is used more often than tren. Laurabolin is the vet version of deca -but that stuff is another story as drugs-horomones for the most part aren't species selective.
Trenbolone is the most used and abused anabolic steroids in the US today.
Why? because the availability of pellets and these "kits".
Every kid and his brother not conected with regular anabolic steroids supplies or sources have access to this "wonder drug"and will eat it, snort it, rub it, and shoot it.
The kits produce a clean but yet dirty product for the body. Clean as it may be bacteria free but contain clean contaminants or irritants.
Examples:
A. Way too much solvent is used for the body to appropriately handle safely. Most kits are a combo of BA and BB and require 10 mls for 4 grams. There is no magic solution-solvents are solvents and cause discomfort-some more than others. Solvents are about the only thing anabolic steroids are soluable in besides oil-which we know has minimal toxicity.
(comment from basskiller: Most kits only use 3 to 4 mls of the combined BA and BB, not the 10mls as mentioned here)
Now here is the part most will disagree with.
These kits produce about 50-70% of the dose they say they do.
Most kits would test out at 35-60 mg per ml if that. I was going to make some and test it through San Raf, but there was/is not much support nor do I care to use these anyway anymore. (comment from basskiller: He pulled these numbers from where? There was a test done on a finaplix conversion and it came out to be 95mgs/1ml)
And plus people would scream BIAS if I was involved in anyway because the magic solvents have been exposed a while ago.
Why less than dose per ml than advertised or promised?
Because 10 mls solvent is not enough to extract 4 grams of hormone from the pressed cellulose acetate in the pellets to which the tren is bound to.
A friend of mine did a study years ago and he sells TP kits so he can back me up.
He was looking at the various solvents used to extract tren from pellets and their yield.
Each experiment was performed twice and using 2 grams pellets in 100 mls solvent coffee filtered and allowed to evap with the tren powder recovered and weighed.
Results:
1. Ether-yielded 1.86 grams
2. Methanol yielded 1.74 Grams
3 Acetone yielded 1.64 grams
BA BB was not done because of the very high evaporation points.
So someone explain to me how 10 mls of solvent will yield 100% extraction and no cellulose will be in the end product?
If kit makers provided you with a molecular weight syringe filter in addition to the sterile filters maybe it would be a cleaner product....
Kits produce a very allergic, toxic product in their own even though sterile filtered and baked.
Original Trenbolone Acetate was marketed as Finaject and was 30mg/ml. It was taken off the market in 1987, Parabolan the long acting human version of Trenbolone was trashed in 1996 there are human studies done of course with Parabolan and most of the ones noted were on the psychological effects caused even by the long ester.
TA is a veterinary drug and no human studies are available.
Equipoise Boldenone Undecylate is also a vet drug but it is used more often than tren. Laurabolin is the vet version of deca -but that stuff is another story as drugs-horomones for the most part aren't species selective.
Trenbolone is the most used and abused anabolic steroids in the US today.
Why? because the availability of pellets and these "kits".
Every kid and his brother not conected with regular anabolic steroids supplies or sources have access to this "wonder drug"and will eat it, snort it, rub it, and shoot it.
The kits produce a clean but yet dirty product for the body. Clean as it may be bacteria free but contain clean contaminants or irritants.
Examples:
A. Way too much solvent is used for the body to appropriately handle safely. Most kits are a combo of BA and BB and require 10 mls for 4 grams. There is no magic solution-solvents are solvents and cause discomfort-some more than others. Solvents are about the only thing anabolic steroids are soluable in besides oil-which we know has minimal toxicity.
(comment from basskiller: Most kits only use 3 to 4 mls of the combined BA and BB, not the 10mls as mentioned here)
Now here is the part most will disagree with.
These kits produce about 50-70% of the dose they say they do.
Most kits would test out at 35-60 mg per ml if that. I was going to make some and test it through San Raf, but there was/is not much support nor do I care to use these anyway anymore. (comment from basskiller: He pulled these numbers from where? There was a test done on a finaplix conversion and it came out to be 95mgs/1ml)
And plus people would scream BIAS if I was involved in anyway because the magic solvents have been exposed a while ago.
Why less than dose per ml than advertised or promised?
Because 10 mls solvent is not enough to extract 4 grams of hormone from the pressed cellulose acetate in the pellets to which the tren is bound to.
A friend of mine did a study years ago and he sells TP kits so he can back me up.
He was looking at the various solvents used to extract tren from pellets and their yield.
Each experiment was performed twice and using 2 grams pellets in 100 mls solvent coffee filtered and allowed to evap with the tren powder recovered and weighed.
Results:
1. Ether-yielded 1.86 grams
2. Methanol yielded 1.74 Grams
3 Acetone yielded 1.64 grams
BA BB was not done because of the very high evaporation points.
So someone explain to me how 10 mls of solvent will yield 100% extraction and no cellulose will be in the end product?
If kit makers provided you with a molecular weight syringe filter in addition to the sterile filters maybe it would be a cleaner product....
Kits produce a very allergic, toxic product in their own even though sterile filtered and baked.
Comment